Search


Archives
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • December 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • Powered by WordPress

    Bad Behavior has blocked 39 access attempts in the last 7 days.

    home

    Poo on you, JK!

    October 20, 2007
    R. Batty @ 11:43 pm

    Having just finished one of the phil sci books I needed to read this weekend, I felt entitled to a brief study break. And in keeping with my promise to post more, I am posting, even if it’s news that you’ve probably heard by now.

    Rowling says Dumbledore is gay.

    Now, as far as the character goes, I don’t really have feelings about this one way or another, since Dumbledore’s sexuality was never really something I wondered about. It just isn’t relevant at all–neither in the books, or now. But as for Rowling’s ‘outing’ her fictional character on a book tour… I’m sorry, if it’s not in the book, it doesn’t really count. You can’t have your cake and eat it too: “Oh, I’m so liberal and committed to cultural diversity and tolerance that I’m going to have a gay character in my books, but I want to sell as many books as possible and not offend anyone so I’m not actually going to put that detail in my books.” If she saw it as being fundamental to Dumbledore’s character, or if she was really committed to teaching a lesson about diversity and acceptance, then you should have had the guts to actually make it a part of the story! (Not that the Lupin the reviled werewolf subplot wasn’t a fairly transparent allegory…) Frankly, I think the whole thing is a completely unnecessary “fact” aimed at drumming up a little publicity now that she’s in the I-finished-the-series doldrums. Or maybe she’s just trying to make people forget that her book ended with the worst epilogue ever written. Lily, and Hugo, and Scorpius, oh my!

    Okay, no more cynical musings from me. Time to move on and read about The Fate of Knowledge!

    No Comments »

    No comments yet.

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    Leave a comment